Re: gphoto2 and libgphoto2

[Tim Waugh <twaugh redhat com>]

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:

> Is there a reason why gphoto2 and libgphoto2 are in the same package
> and not two seperate ones? I'd like a separate libgphoto2
> package. The library is used by more frontends then just gphoto2.

What's the advantage of separating the (tiny) gphoto2 binary out?

Tim.
*/

Attachment: pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature