Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[Carwyn Edwards <carwyn carwyn com>]

Stephen Smoogen wrote:

> Ah.. the problem for us has come that we need a ton of diskless systems,
> but that many have to run different configurations that are out of step
> from a central image. I had hoped this would be the exception rather
> than the rule, but it has become more of the rule than anyone expected
> (and seems to be the rule at other similar organizations.)
>  

There's some high level discussion on things related to this here:

http://www.gridweaver.org/

.. a high level look at the different large scale configuration systems 
out there with a view to what's needed going forward to managing Grid 
systems. There are case studies for a number of existing large scale 
installations in there ranging from 120 nodes to 1100.

Carwyn