[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
cpp signed differently from gcc?
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: cpp signed differently from gcc?
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:26:12 -0700
Not sure anyone cares, but I saw something strange.
[root devel6 s390x]# rpm -U cpp-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-c++-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-g77-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-java-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libstdc++-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libgcj-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libgcc-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libf2c-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm /mnt/redhat/beehive/comps/dist/fc2/gettext/0.14.1-2.1/s390x/gettext-0.14.1-2.1.s390x.rpm libstdc++-devel-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libgcj-devel-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm
warning: cpp-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8
[root devel6 s390x]#
This would be a non-event except that everything in that directory
is built from the same SRPM by the same Beehive run. So, why is
everything signed right but not cpp? I suspect a run of gpg with
"gcc*" argument.
-- Pete
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]