[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: cpp signed differently from gcc?
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: cpp signed differently from gcc?
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Not sure anyone cares, but I saw something strange.
>
> [root devel6 s390x]# rpm -U cpp-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-c++-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-g77-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm gcc-java-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libstdc++-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libgcj-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libgcc-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libf2c-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm /mnt/redhat/beehive/comps/dist/fc2/gettext/0.14.1-2.1/s390x/gettext-0.14.1-2.1.s390x.rpm libstdc++-devel-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm libgcj-devel-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm
> warning: cpp-3.3.3-7.s390x.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8
I think the warning is only given once per key ID. rpm -Kv *.rpm seems to
bear that out.
Best,
-- Elliot
I keep committing atrocities in an attempt to learn from my mistakes.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]