[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Logrotate RFE (2)
- From: Harry Putnam <reader newsguy com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Logrotate RFE (2)
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:14:43 -0600
Keith Lofstrom <keithl kl-ic com> writes:
> Logrotate is the program called by cron to rename and expire log
> files. Ruedinger Oertel at SUSE (ro suse de) has some patches that
> enhance the basic Redhat logrotate with "dateext". This allows a
> dated log file extension rather than a numbered one, for example
> /var/log/messages.20031029 . The old logfiles do not get renamed,
> just discarded after they get too old. This is a lot easier on
> rsync, and it also is easier to administer.
Note: These comments are not well researched... yet, but only a
suggestion to pursue...
I think they do get renamed... like:
somelog becomes somelog.0
somelog.0 becomes somelog.1
etc
Up to whatever number logrotate.conf is set to rotate `some.log'
Seems like at each hop ... the file would have to be exactly the same
size as its predecessor for this to effect rsync.
> What are the proper steps to get these patches folded into the main
> development path for Fedora Core? I mentioned this on this list in
> October with a few positive comments, and submitted an RFE to bugzilla:
Are we really sure this is such a good idea? I don't see any real
advantage over the old way. And I'm probably not the only one who has
home-made tools that depend on the current naming system.
Seems like adding the date stamp is only dubbling the info already
available in long ls output.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]