[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Announcing Fedora Tracker -- comments?
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Tracker -- comments?
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:41:58 -0500
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:21:45PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Order of Precedent
> ------------------
> 1) Fedora Core
> 2) Fedora Extras (currently at fedora.us)
> 3) Non-US Extras (rpm.livna.org)
> 4) Everything Else
> a) Fedora Alternatives (Does not exist yet)
> b) 3rd party repositories
I'd have thought the order of precedence was a user matter at the end of
the day. Certainly I'd want 0) My own collection and US folks probably
wouldn't want 3) at all
As a rather nifty visualisation tool there is no point crippling it
Alan
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]