[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Tracker: Part Deux
- From: Chip Turner <cturner redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Fedora Tracker: Part Deux
- Date: 29 Mar 2004 20:20:22 -0500
Brad Smith <brads redhat com> writes:
> > When multiple versions of the same
> > package are returned within a category, it should sort so that the
> > "newest" package is displayed first.
> >
>
> The query currently does "ORDER BY package.name, package.version,
> package.release, package.arch", which should (and seems to) list
> packages in descending version order. Would it be simpler if the package
> list was not also sorted by arch, or are you referring to something
> else?
Won't quite work -- the alphabetical ordering of versions isn't
necessarily correct wrt rpm's versioning. rpmvercmp is a bit more
complicated, unfortunately.
Chip
--
Chip Turner cturner redhat com
Red Hat, Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]