Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 18:07 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:57:21PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > /srv - user data for services not owned by a single specific user there
> > ie:
> >    /srv/www
> >    /srv/vsftpd
> >    /srv/postgresql ?
> >    /srv/mysql ?
> >    /srv/jabberd ?
> >    /srv/bittorrent ?
> > 
> > /media - all the removable media and silliness there.
> 
> If I remember right, Red Hat people hate both of these. For whatever that's
> worth. :)

I talked to bill nottingham about it - he didn't seem opposed to /srv
but a bit annoyed by /media

I don't think it matters fhs compliance is a must, imo.

-sv