[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Behavior differences between anaconda and "real" boot? (sata_nv problem)
- From: Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Behavior differences between anaconda and "real" boot? (sata_nv problem)
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:44:30 -0600
Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger <fedora-devel camperquake de> said:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:29:48PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > So I was wondering what the issue could be. Some anaconda magic that the
> > installed system doesn't perform? Having an i686 kernel on that x86-64
> > machine and anaconda having yet another one?
>
> I seem to recall that anaconda boots an i586 kernel.
Not for FC3; I can't boot the installer on an AMD K6-III (sigh).
--
Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]