[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Reopen a request for gpgme in Core



On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 18:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:06:59 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> > > Two observations: Where's the patch to be found? And shouldn't you use
> > > Sylpheed rather than Evolution? ;)
> > > 
> > Heh heh now that it does gpg signing/verification on my box I might start using
> > it :-)  Truth to tell, there are some features of Evolution I'm somewhat loathe
> > to lose so I might have to bounce between the two mailers for a while depending
> > on what I'm doing.
> > 
> > The current version of the patch can be found here:
> >   http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/sylpheed-gpgme1.0-12.patch
> 
> Thanks. I'm going to apply this and also serve as a guinea pig, because
> currently I still use a GPGME 0.3.x enabled Sylpheed. 
> 
> GPGME 1.0 and dependencies are in the fedora.us submission list
> already. Bugs: 2178 -> 2179 -> 2180 <- 2185
> 
> Among the things to examine are:
> 
>  * Dependencies on GPGME 0.4.x: gpa, elmo
>  * Dependencies on GPGME 0.3.x: cryptplug, seahorse, sylpheed-claws
>    (seahorse is very old, but pcomptom said maybe he will continue it)

Actually, newer seahorse requires gpgme-1.0.x as well


Phil


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]