[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Reopen a request for gpgme in Core
- From: Toshio Kuratomi <toshio tiki-lounge com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Reopen a request for gpgme in Core
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:01:54 -0800
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:15:33PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:06:59 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > The current version of the patch can be found here:
> > http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/sylpheed-gpgme1.0-12.patch
>
> First attempt at getting the entire suite built, has been unsuccessful.
> Trying to sign a message gives an error dialog:
>
> Error Could not find any key associated with currently selected
> key id `mschwendt'.
>
> Should I go back to GPGME 0.4.x? Without having looked into it at
> all, what has gone wrong?
>
Is gpgme-1.0 using gnupg2 as its backend or gpg-1.x? Is your mschwendt key
available to the version of gpg being used? (I'm using gpgme targetted
against the fedora provided gpg-1.x right now. Have to build some stuff
from fedora.us to test the gpg2 combo.)
> $ rpm -q gpgme gnupg2 libksba sylpheed-gpg
> gpgme-1.0.2-0.fdr.1
> gnupg2-1.9.11-0.fdr.2
> libksba-0.9.9-0.fdr.1
> sylpheed-gpg-1.0.0-0.fdr.2
-Toshio
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]