Re: [Possibly OT] Trademarks

[Seth Nickell <snickell redhat com>]

On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 21:27 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> pri rhl3 iadonisi to (Paul Iadonisi) writes:
> 
> >   At the risk of stirring up a hornets' nest, I'd like to pose the
> > question to Red Hatters: what approach are you taking to trademarks?
> >   Apparently, there is (was?) some discussion going on at debian-legal
> > regarding Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird.  At first glance, I
> > see that there are quite a few patches included in the firefox rpm in
> > FC3 and even more in rawhide and I'm wondering if Red Hat has filtered
> > this through its legal eagles, since it is still called Firefox.
> 
> ACK; I really doubt whether rawhide's firefox can be called 'Firefox'.
> The applied patches lower quality and reputation of the Mozilla Firefox
> product significantly (buttugly icons, removed functionality for upgrading
> extensions with security leaks) so I do not see how the Mozilla Foundation
> could accept this package as an official build or a "Community Edition";
> it is definitively an "Iceweasel".

Chris Aillon is a girl!!!