Re: Fedora Core 4

[Caolan McNamara <caolanm redhat com>]

On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 17:19 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
> > 
> > I've the critical "required" bits of the 2.0 series working with gcj and
> > awaiting OOo qa for integration into the mainline, so the important
> > changes are likely to happen before the final 2.0 release unless there
> > is a QA problem. The bits that don't currently compile with gcj despite
> > those changes are listed at
> > http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=jdk&msgNo=127
> > 
> > C.
> 
> 
> ok. thanks for taking the time to respond. I was worried that the java
> database wouldnt work at all in gcj. looks like that isnt in the case
> for the major parts alteast

Not totally up to speed on what the "java database" story is, it *could*
be hsqldb. so hsqldb's use of "sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction" is
problematic. 

C.