[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: perl INSTALLDIRS=vendor
- From: Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: perl INSTALLDIRS=vendor
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:52:27 -0600
Once upon a time, Chip Turner <cturner redhat com> said:
> Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi> writes:
> > The modules come from a vendor -> they should go into vendor install
> > dirs. Site install dirs are for local site installs so that admins can
> > override system installed stuff a la "perl -MCPAN -e install Foo-Bar"
> > and traditional tarball install. (Moving site_perl in /usr/local/...
> > would make this clearer FHS-wise.)
>
> I like that idea. A lot. I'd not thought about it til now, but that
> makes a tremendous amount of sense. It would also address the manpage
> issue, I think. It would break backwards compatibility, though, with
> older RPMs (unless we still looked in the /usr/lib/.../site_perl/
> dirs, but I'm inclined not to).
Hmm, you might as well change "vendor_perl" to "rpm_perl" then. I don't
want RPM touching /usr/local (that's for the few odds and ends I install
manually and local or per-system scripts), but I install perl modules
from RPMs all the time. "vendor" to me means Red Hat or Fedora, so I
wouldn't make my perl module RPMs install into the "vendor" directory.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]