[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
- From: Dave Jones <davej redhat com>
- To: Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta gmail com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:09:53 -0500
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:53:11PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Pan is still in rawhide; I take it it won't be for long? What are we
> > supposed to use instead of pan? Last time I tried to load a large
> > binaries group (alt.binaries.emulators.mame) in Thunderbird it locked up
> > solid. Also, does Thunderbird handle yEnc (Mozilla didn't last time I
> > tried)?
> It's entirely possible I mistyped. But I believe Thunderbird and
> Evolution both read news.
Evolution and Thunderbird are also utterly unusable on a machine
with < 256MB, and a slow CPU in my experience, whereas pan seemed
very capable of running comfortably in 128MB.
Dave
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]