Re: further package removals/potential package removals

[Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>]

On Jan 24, 2005, seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> wrote:

>> ATM, Extras isn't much more than a "promise", ... we will see if it will
>> come and if when it will work out.

> just consider pre-extras as 'extras' for now.

I thought current pre-extras was for FC3.  Do we have a separate tree
I'm not aware of tracking rawhide?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}