On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 08:52 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
How comes, FE/fedora.us is able to maintain it?RH has the ability to change this at any time.ability? yes. willingness? no.
It is not - RH has had no problems in adding yum support and has no
problem in adding and removing other packages at any time at RH's free
Do you know why they had no issue adding yum support? B/c it could be covered internally. If it broke and I wasn't around to fix it - they could take care of it.
100+ lines of C++ they were not interested in maintaining.
I know apt's code is ... ... leaves a lot to be desired, but it doesn't
require that much effort to maintain the package.
I guess, I do ... I spent way too much time with rpmlib and apt.For example instead of adding yum and keeping up2date, RH could haveIMO you don't know what you're talking about.
tried to help apt. - IMO, this is all politics and not at all