[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name



On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:

If i understand the argument that people are making... is that doing
it this way... is a burden on 3rd party packagers who have to try to
predict when and if Core is going to introduce a libname[Version] for
previous versions.

Whenever that happens - when a Core package is renamed like this - the 3rd party packagers need to update their spec files to make them buildrequire libname[Version]-devel instead.

I thought the proposal included that each package include Provides: libname = %version or was that also determined to be problematic?

-- Rex


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]