Re: What next?

[Rodd Clarkson <rodd clarkson id au>]

On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 23:38 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
> ons, 01.06.2005 kl. 22.35 skrev Matthew Miller:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:31:32PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > What about stretching out the dev cycle from 3months dev + 3 months of
> > > testing to something more like 6 months of dev + 3 months of testing.
> > > I'd be willing to work toward that feature.
> > 
> > That would be awesome. And it'd take some of the pressure off of Fedora
> > Legacy.
> > 
> Could fedora legacy use the same repourls as fedora core/extras? So that
> it would just continue to be "yum update"?

I've often wondered why the final update for fedora (before cgoing
legacy) doesn't include a switch to fedora legacy as part of it.


R.

-- 
"It's a fine line between denial and faith.
 It's much better on my side"