Re: What next?

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 17:05 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> 
> > But if hobbyists cannot participate in development b/c the cycle is just
> > too fast, well then it's not too terribly useful for us, is it.
> 
> I don't buy this argument at all. 

I'm sorry you don't buy it - but I wasn't stating an opinion, I was
describing the case.


>  So what if the changes you're working on don't go in the next release?  

Well the changes I'm working on for this next release affect anaconda
and the package updater in use on fedora, so, yah, I think there is a
problem if they don't go in the next release.


-sv