Re: mtune=nocona

[Alan Cox <alan redhat com>]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:33:03AM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> When we use tuning to Intel Nocona, SPECFP2000 is 2.7% and SPECINT2000 
> is 1.6% worse on Opteron.

And neither specfp or specint are related to anything but compiler and processor
benchmarketing in my experience.

> Code tuned for Intel Nocona parctically always has smaller size.

That could well make up for some of the other hit on a real  systems