Re: FC4 kernel performance

[Bernardo Innocenti <bernie develer com>]

Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> On 6/24/05, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie develer com> wrote:
> 
>>I'm ashamed to admit that sometimes I envy NTFS's transparent
>>file compression.  Yes, it's very slow for general use, but it
>>would be ideal for backups, old log files, etc.
> 
>
> It's insane that it is slow... unless you modify the file compression
> should make things faster.. substantially so.  The modify part is hard
> unless you're working with a file system that can solve it as
> elegantly as reiser4 can...


Yes, NTFS compression isn't generally slow when just reading
sequentially.  Slow operations are seeks, writes and even appends.

I know a company who used NTFS compression to store transaction
records in a POS application.  Tests were done with small data
sets.  When they went to production, they had to quickly revert
installed systems to uncompressed storage.  Apparently, appending
a transaction to the journal was a linear operation :-)

I don't know for sure, but JFFS2 shouldn't suffer from this
problem.  Using it on a 2MB flash, I can't test it with large
files :-)

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/