[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Non-free Extras?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan fenrus demon nl>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Non-free Extras?
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:56:17 +0100
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 05:03 -0500, Benjy Grogan wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/06, Avi Kivity <avi argo co il> wrote:
> Goede, J.W.R. de wrote:
>
> >Talking about solutions and not problems I propose:
> >-Fedora Extras (as is)
> >-Fedora Patent Encumbered (better name) aka
> > Debian non-US
> >-Fedora Non Commercial
> >-Fedora Non Free
> >
> >
> We would also need
> -Fedora for Non-Lawyers
>
> for ordinary users. How is one supposed to figure out where to
> look for
> things, and what all these repositories mean? This should be
> kept simple.
>
> Is there a way of including proprietary drivers with the Fedora
> Project?
since these drivers are rather "shakey" with respect to copyright law
(which is different than the traditional "US Patents" reason for not
including things) I would say "No."
In fact just about all other distros don't do these drivers either, or
not anymore.....
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]