[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Double dare ya, Fedora! And your art sucks!
- From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Double dare ya, Fedora! And your art sucks!
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:35:14 +0530
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:56 -0300, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
> Andy Green escreveu:
> > Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >
> > (...)
> > > But the art problem pales compared to the issue that everyone has
> > > been
> > > ducking, which is Fedora's support for DVDs and proprietary audio
> > > and
> > > video and web-streaming formats and Java applets. That is to say,
> > > its
> > ...
> > > It's 2006, people. The Web is fifteen years old. Even non-
> > > techies
> > > have had a decade to form expectations about what constitutes a
> > > base
> >
> > Supporting Flash seems to soak up most of the problem that can be
> > solved, eg, youtube, Google Video, and if you have 32-bit firefox
> > you can have it. Seems the only answer for Quicktime and such is
> > the corporate mantrap that is Mplayer, it makes no sense for Redhat
> > to invite attack on their cash by playing that game. There is no
> > limit to the number of dangerous proprietary formats that one could
> > address by that logic.
> >
> This kind of argument only shows 2 things:
>
> 1. RedHat/Fedora people are absolutelly unable to deal with major
> manufacturers (Adobe for Instance) and have good versions of
> Flash/Shockwave and (Apple) Quicktime. Curious thing is that
> my Apple Mini (a real wonder) runs OS X Tiger (that is a *NIX
> system) and has no problems with flash, shockwave or PDF
> files... as well as don't have problems with device drivers.
> 2. RedHat wants, in the mid-range/long term to have a "commercial
> product" where those "facilities" and other "utilities" are
> sold at a price...
or 3. We actually want Fedora to be a entirely Free and open source
system like stated explicitly. Funny how that works.
> In software market everything is gray zone. You issue MySql and AFAIK
> it is not really "open source", but them you stripe it (so RHEL can
> have the full flavour and the others don't).
MySQL is not open source. That's news to me. Why doesn't it qualify?
> You may not know, but what was done to PHP in FC-5 is a shame. There
> is no f_ck_g way to make international encoding to work well.
Did you file a bug report? That would be a first step for all confirmed
bugs.
Rahul
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]