[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: is DEVICE in ifcfg-* redundant?
- From: Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: is DEVICE in ifcfg-* redundant?
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:44:55 +0200
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:33:55PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> 1) Are there cases, where the file name differs from ifcfg-$DEVICE?
Yes, life is not that easy.
There is also DEVNAME and in existing (more complex) PPP config setups
I have for example in a file called ifcfg-peer10:
DEVICE=ppp10
DEVNAME=peer10
> 2) Could we agree that if DEVICE is not set, it defaults to
> ${CONFIG##*ifcfg-}
> ? (I.e., source_config in network-functions would set it.)
DEVNAME defaults to ${CONFIG##*ifcfg-} and this does not need to
be the same as DEVICE. So what you actually propose is to let
DEVICE default to DEVNAME.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]