[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: is DEVICE in ifcfg-* redundant?
- From: Laurent Rineau <laurent rineau__fedora normalesup org>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: is DEVICE in ifcfg-* redundant?
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:07:36 +0200
On Friday 10 August 2007 13:33:55 Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in most cases, /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-foo contains
> DEVICE=foo
>
> 1) Are there cases, where the file name differs from ifcfg-$DEVICE?
On my machine, I have several icfg-$STUFF where STUFF is not a device name,
but a sort of config name.
For example, I have some files like ifcfg-PierreHome, with DEVICE=eth1, that
allows me to set up a network with "ifup PierreHome", when I am not at home.
Nowdays, I prefere to use NetworkManager, instead of ifup, but ifup is a
fallback when I debug NetworkManager.
--
Laurent Rineau
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]