[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: is DEVICE in ifcfg-* redundant?
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: is DEVICE in ifcfg-* redundant?
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:59:34 -0400
Stepan Kasal (skasal redhat com) said:
> Hello,
>
> in most cases, /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-foo contains
> DEVICE=foo
>
> 1) Are there cases, where the file name differs from ifcfg-$DEVICE?
Yes - alternate configurations, dial-up, etc.
> 2) Could we agree that if DEVICE is not set, it defaults to
> ${CONFIG##*ifcfg-}
> ? (I.e., source_config in network-functions would set it.)
It's a reasonable default, yes. File a bz?
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]