[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: TeXLive status
- From: Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: TeXLive status
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:55:57 +0200
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The new packages contain updated xpdf-3.02 from upstream to fix CVE-2007-3387,
Seems to me that it would be better to keep xpdf separate for texlive.
> The new texmf packages contain packaging fixes, it obsoletes tetex-eurofont and
> tetex-tex4ht as it's now part of TeXLive. We can add tetex-eurofont and tetex-tex4ht
> maintainers to comaintainer list so that they can maintain it in TeXLive if they
I am the tetex-tex4ht maintainer, and as it is updated regularly I am
not sure that it is a good idea to have it in texlive. Moreover it is
already a complicated package by itself, especially if you want to be
able to build from the literate sources. I am not definitively against
maintaining it within texlive, but it isn't obvious to me that it is the
best way. I haven't have a look at texlive already, though.
--
Pat
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]