Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 09:22 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
=
> I think this is wrong, I am sorry I didn't catch it before, but if
> COPYING is not just a mere copy of the GPL license as published by the
> FSF, but it is actually an obviously edited file which express the
> intention of the Author, it do matter by all means, and it express the
> license you should use.

See my other email for this case, but yes:

If the source code doesn't specify a version, and documentation exists
from upstream that clearly shows the intention of the Author, then that
documentation is valid for determining the license version.

~spot