Re: KDE: replacing dolphin

[Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:06:45AM +0200, Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> I think it will be better to name the package d3lphin, which should
> 'obsoletes' and 'provides' dolphin, as d3lphin is the official name, and
> is officially a dolphin's fork.
> Why should we keep existing dolphin as it ? It don't understand the
> benefit, as its is unmaintained upstream, and it will also give the
> maintainers some - in my opinion - useless work.

But the KDE4 dolphin is still maintained? If we make the older package
obsolete the newer one, that seems like upgrade pain later.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>