[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: /lib/lsb/init-functions vs. /etc/init.d/functions in init scripts?
- From: Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: /lib/lsb/init-functions vs. /etc/init.d/functions in init scripts?
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:55:04 +0200
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:14PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> Does one have to require redhat-lsb in your RPM spec file?
Aside from Jeremy's response, I would suggest then to require "lsb",
or (whatever's applicable) some variant with/without a version number
(e.g., "lsb-core-noarch >= 3.1"), which is already "provided" by
redhat-lsb, so that the dependency is not about the specific package
name, that could also have been fedora-lsb, or something else.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]