Re: Guidelines for creating subpackages?

[Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>]

Christopher Stone wrote:

> This is an *extremely* important topic.
> 
> Let's face it, if Fedora wants to have any hope of becoming a base
> distribution for all other distributions, then all optional requires
> will need to be split into sub-packages.
> 
> We must have as fine a granularity in our packages as possible.

When/if it makes sense, and doesn't create an unduly increased maintainance
burden, sure. 

-- Rex