[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?
- From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt tmp0701 nospam arcor de>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:52:15 +0100
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:33:42 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> > Does anybody know whether anything has been decided on setting an
> > explicit "umask 022" at the beginning of scriptlets?
>
> I don't know the example of 022, however for 133 I know
> a example.
022 (g-w,o-w) is a subset of 0133 (u-x,g-wx,o-wx), so they are closely
related.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]