Re: umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?

[Michael Schwendt <mschwendt tmp0701 nospam arcor de>]

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:35:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:

> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Rex Dieter said: 
> >>> Does anybody know whether anything has been decided on setting an
> >>> explicit "umask 022" at the beginning of scriptlets?
> >> Looks like it's not a bad idea. 
> > I would strongly suggest that this is something that is best enforced
> > in rpm itself rather than in every scriplet.
> 
> Even better, sure.

Better? Yes.  Becoming reality in the short-term? Probably not.
Becoming reality for FC-6 and FC-5? Less likely.