[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RPATH status

From: Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>
To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
Subject: Re: RPATH status
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:20:31 +0100

Alexander Boström <abo kth se> writes:

>> | /usr/bin   -> /vol1/usr/bin
>> | /usr/lib64 -> /vol2/usr/lib64
>> 
>> the RPATH above would be resolved to /vol1/usr/lib64/... 
>
> Perhaps a bind mount would be better in situations like that?

Perhaps; but there is nothing which forbids the symlink layout. In
practice, I saw this with '/afs/.../bin -> ...' links; bind mounts
might be more complicated in such a setup.

Enrico

Attachment: pgphOZT2cpytZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- RPATH status
  - From: Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: RPATH status
  - From: Christopher Aillon
- Re: RPATH status
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: RPATH status
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: RPATH status
  - From: Enrico Scholz
- Re: RPATH status
  - From: Alexander Boström

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]