[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: with or without fedora-usermgmt



Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Vrabec (pvrabec redhat com) said: 
>> Don't you think somebody should make some decision here:
>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html
>> - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there
>> My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt.
> 
> My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, 

And what do you plan to do during upgrade if there are some slots
already occupied?

I suggest to avoid using static UID as much as possible.

> and just do static
> registrations for everything - it's simpler. It can be combined with
> making dynamic system IDs  go from 499 down as well.
> 
> Bill
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]