Re: with or without fedora-usermgmt

[Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:34:07PM +0100, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> >> Don't you think somebody should make some decision here:
> >> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html
> >> - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there
> >> My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt.
> > My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, 
> And what do you plan to do during upgrade if there are some slots
> already occupied?

The suggestion of falling back to a dynamic UID is probably best -- then
those systems are no worse than before.


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>