[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Filesystem-local databases in mlocate
- From: Simo Sorce <ssorce redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Filesystem-local databases in mlocate
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:22:01 -0400
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 14:02 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> The default setup should asume the worst, e.g. have the indexes owned
> by root:root, so no remote fs old or new will be able to access the
> data if the admin of the server doesn't allow it.
Which kind of defeats the whole thing of having per FS locatedbs ... and
is a temptation for admins to change it to nobody:nobody and give away
info easily without fully recognizing the security problem.
However, I see the value for those 0.01% users using clustered file
systems. So, if we stop talking about net FSs and instead we talk about
SANs and GFS/GPFS/Lustre/OCFS2/whatever, I think it makes more sense :)
Simo.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]