[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: fedora-maintainers vs fedora-devel
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>
- To: fedora-maintainers redhat com, fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: fedora-maintainers vs fedora-devel
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:48:49 -0400
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:39:13PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> since it comes up every now and then, I'd like to get the differences
> clarified, especially since there are ideas to get them united, which
> if the contents and target groups are too different would be wrong.
[...]
> o fedora-devel
> - concentrates on rawhide and its way to a release
> - has in-house upstream development discussion
> - more in-depth Linux mechanics
> - manages release cycle
> o fedora-maintainers
> - concentrates on the packaging community as a whole
> - More issues about packaging than on upstream development, if any
> - cares more about current and past releases
I'd kind of like it like this: extended discussion goes on fedora-devel. If
you get behind and have to delete it all to catch up, you'll be okay. Things
on fedora-maintainers should at least have the subjects skimmed through.
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Matthew Miller mattdm mattdm org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]