[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: fedora-maintainers vs fedora-devel
- From: Karl MacMillan <kmacmill redhat com>
- To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: fedora-maintainers vs fedora-devel
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:33:55 -0400
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 14:45 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:39:13 Axel Thimm wrote:
> > The way I see it it is like the following:
> >
> > o fedora-devel
> > - concentrates on rawhide and its way to a release
> > - has in-house upstream development discussion
> > - more in-depth Linux mechanics
> > - manages release cycle
> >
> > o fedora-maintainers
> > - concentrates on the packaging community as a whole
> > - More issues about packaging than on upstream development, if any
> > - cares more about current and past releases
>
> Actually I do all the freeze and collection announcements to
> fedora-maintainers. They're the people that need to know, and it's largely
> just noise for fedora-devel.
I may not be typical as I don't maintain any packages, but I do upstream
work that often specifically targets Fedora releases. So seeing freeze
announcements and similar on fedora-devel would be helpful. Not a big
deal as I usually hear this from package maintainers indirectly, but
more direct information would sometimes help.
Karl
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]