Re: rpms/ettercap/devel ettercap.spec,1.4,1.5

[Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>]

Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:16:09 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

>> >> I disagree, I've done it, and it works just fine.  I've advocated that
>> >> all alternatives-using-packages (particularly jpackage ones) use this
>> >> technique.

>> > Now you've got N packages which pretend they own a file/symlink.

>> That's as it should be, imo.  You would rather the file/symlink be
>> unowned?

> But sure! The link target does not belong into any package

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree then, that's ok. :)

-- Rex