[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot

From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:49:53 -0400

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:08:37AM +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Yeah, I agree, but after going trough the article I cannot pass by in
> silence the fact that while in Fedora 5 the disk maximum throughput was
> 29 MB/s in Rawhide it's only 8 MB/s which is nearly 4x less...

That would be a bug or a misconfiguration somewhere. I'm suprised someone
would put that in an article instead of filing a bug.

Alan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: David Nielsen
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Dave Jones
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: David Mansfield

References:
- F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Dimi Paun
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Lubomir Kundrak
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Dimi Paun
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Emmanuel Seyman
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Balaji Ravindran
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Oscar Victorio Calixto Bacho
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
- Re: F8/9 6-16x slower than XP to boot
  - From: Martin Sourada

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]