Re: upstart plans for F10+

["Colin Walters" <walters verbum org>]

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote:
>
> Once we get upstart 0.5 in, we can then look at potentially moving
> some subset of things that are now handled elsewhere to upstart.
> Examples would be:
>
> - Always-on services such as dbus, syslog, and audit

Last time I talked to Scott he had in-progress code to make 0.5 manage
the system bus internally.  If the system bus depends on syslog and
audit those may need to be started too.

> - Reworking things like netfs to be more sane, when
>  it comes to networks coming and going, network block devices being
>  attached and detached, and so on

Aren't pretty much all kernel based network filesystems broken in the
world of dynamic networking?