Re: No Full Control Install!

[Doug Stewart <dstewart atl lmco com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David C. Hart wrote:

| But that might overwrite things that I don't want upgraded.
|
~ > I don't recall that at all. Moreover, then the description of the
| "Custom" option is inaccurate. I also suspect that this will create
| problems for people who have Gnome installed. Given the presumed
| constituency of Fedora users, I cannot understand why there is no way to
| exact full control over the installation. What was the downside of
| maintaining the "individual package" option?
|

You must not have been paying attention to the fedora-test-list.

The thinking goes (and someone from RH correct me if I'm wrong) is that
anaconda is the wrong place to be doing package selection.  Eventually,
FC should just get enough of a system up and running for the users to be
able to select/install packages from a nice, X-enabled FirstBoot situation.
|
| --
| fedora-list mailing list
| fedora-list redhat com
| http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


- --
- ----------
Doug Stewart
Systems Administrator/Web Applications Developer
Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs
dstewart atl lmco com

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/q+vEN50Q8DVvcvkRAmyyAJ91Hj71M7Urm4O30oXVzRPkEaI1egCfR3Lr
0XUXkBozjbXq3CqJ3j2BVQo=
=Hxq7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----