[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Mysql version question
- From: "Scot L. Harris" <webid cfl rr com>
- To: Fedora List <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Mysql version question
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:19:58 -0400
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 12:55, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> On Mit, 2004-10-06 at 08:43 -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> > And that is why I switched to using postgresql for database
> > applications. Works as well and possibly better than mysql.
>
> Although I do not know the reasons I believe that this is what RedHat
> intended to achieve.
>
> Tom
Actually it was not Red Hat's doing. I made the switch after reading
all the licensing info on Mysql's site and all the posts involved. It
seemed much safer than having to worry about getting a commercial
license from mysql for internal applications or ones that face
customers. Did not need the hassle. I have found postgresql to be very
good so far. And there is no quibbling on the licensing of it.
--
Scot L. Harris
webid cfl rr com
COBOL:
Completely Over and Beyond reason Or Logic.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]