Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?

[John Summerfied <debian herakles homelinux org>]

Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't use spamassassin, I find it more of a hindrance than a help, so
> I wanted to remove it.
>
> yum remove spamassassin
> ...[snip]...
> =============================================================================
>  Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size
> =============================================================================
> Removing:
>  spamassassin            i386       3.0.4-2.fc4      installed         1.8 M
> Removing for dependencies:
>  evolution               i386       2.2.3-2.fc4      installed          24 M
>
> And trying "rpm -e spamassassin" produces the same sort of response.
>
> Surely this is a stupid dependency?  It's supposedly *optional* whether
> you use anti-spam filtering in Evolution (I've never allowed it's junk
> mail checking), why should it *have* to be present?

So you _can_ use the filtering.



--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au  Z1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/

do not reply off-list