[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: qt question
- From: Gene Heskett <gene heskett verizon net>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: qt question
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:10:28 -0500
On Monday 31 January 2005 11:38, Chadley Wilson wrote:
>greetings
>
>I have qt 3.3.xxx installed
>
>there is an app I posted earlier I want to install,
>Is it possible to have multiple versions of qt or must I compile
> from source?
If its looking for an older version of QT, it should work, but may
possibly require a softlink from the name its looking for to the
currently installed version.
Generally speaking, new versions of QT are backwards compatible. Or
at least I have done this, but stayed in the general release, I've
not tried to make softlinks from a QT2 lib to a QT3 lib. That may be
more exersize pushing your luck than you need. :-)
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.32% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]