[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Evolution vs Kmail/Kontack Observation
- From: Chadley Wilson <chadley pinteq co za>
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Evolution vs Kmail/Kontack Observation
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:47:30 +0200
Hi guys,
I recently switched back to fedora from suse9.1
I decided to give good old gnome a bash, but using evolution I noticed that
mail retrieving took quite a long time. Well what can you expect from a super
busy list.
The question is why when I switched back to KDE does Kmail retrieve mail so
much faster.
Going out on a limb here I suppose it has some thing to do with the when and
how it sorts mail. I have the same filters in place on kmail as on evolution
and am subscribed to 16 mailing lists and 6 news groups.
So the filter I have in place are definatly not the issue, and since kmail is
noticabley faster that eliminate the fact that my server could be slow or
busy.
In my test which I conducted today I set evolution (currently my default) to
leave messages on the server.
Tonight I backup my evolution folder, I then configured my account in
evolution and kmail both set to leave messages on the server.
Evolution downloaded the 1500 odd emails in 5 minutes while kmail downloaded
the same (give or take about 10 mails) in 30 seconds.
Is this a common observation or is there something that is not functioning
correctly in my evolution setup?
TIA
--
--
Chadley Wilson
Redhat Certified Technician
Cert Number: 603004708291270
Pinnacle Micro
Manufacturers of Proline Computers
Proudly South African
ISO9001:2000 Certified Production Line
=======================================
LINUX - becuase I can do it my way.
========================================
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]