Re: Yum repros wanted

[Michael Schwendt <mschwendt tmp0501 nospam arcor de>]

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:04:59 -0400, Temlakos wrote:

> Sean O Sullivan wrote:
> > The more repo's you want, the more conflicts and dependancy issues you 
> > will have - it is not a good idea to add every repo you can find.
> > 
> > Personally, base/updated-released/extras, then dag and freshrpms are 
> > very reliable I find. atrpms i usually fine, although wouldn't use for a 
> > server. Other than that wouldn't touch many others - especially not 
> > livna ( http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/FAQ.php#D )
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Sean
> > 
> 
> Are you sure about that? The way I heard it, livna and extras were part 
> of the same mold. Now I'll let Dag and Axel speak for themselves, but 
> the impression I got from following the link you gave is that they 
> wouldn't even want you to use extras, just because the extras 
> maintainers won't "play nice" with them.

What solution could you think of?

-- 
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt users sf net>
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
loadavg: 1.00 1.03 1.05