[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: memory.c - bad pmd - x86_64
- From: Ivan Adzhubey <iadzhubey rics bwh harvard edu>
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: memory.c - bad pmd - x86_64
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:22:32 -0400
On Tue, 31 May 2005 22:30:43 +0200
Christoph Franke <news thefranke net> wrote:
> Dave Jones - Tue, May 24 2005 12:57:15 -0400:
>
> > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:02:40AM -0700, Peter J. Stieber wrote:
> > > DJ = Dave Jones
> > > DJ> Hrmph. No, I screwed up the patch.
> > > DJ> -29 is rebuilding, it'll appear in the FC3/ subdir of my
> > > DJ> people page a little while after its done building.
> > >
> > > here's what I get with 2.6.11-1.29_FC3smp.
> > >
> > > May 24 06:55:43 maggie kernel: collect2:5519 free pmd
> > > ffff8100777f1000 freed by 0xffffffffffffffff
> > > May 24 06:55:43 maggie kernel: mm/memory.c:109: bad pmd
> > > ffff8100777f1000(0000000000000064).
>
> [snip]
>
> I noticed a -30 build on your webspace at people.redhat.com. Is this
> based on 2.6.11.11, and does it nail the bad pmd bug?
Christoph,
I am not Dave, sorry ;). Testing Dave's .30 build right now on my
compute nodes and yet to see any errors, even with memory-intensive
multi-threaded jobs. But I can't test with my fileserver at the moment
since jobs already running that need NFS access. The fileserver box is
the one that gave me most headaches before so I will try rebooting it
under .30 build in the next 24 hours and post results ASAP.
Cheers,
Ivan
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]